AdBlock & Adblock Plus: Chrome extensions

Chrome Extensions are small programs that modify and enhance the functionality of the Chrome browser. The two most popular extensions listed in the Webstore are “AdBlock” and “Adblock Plus” – but which one of the two is the better one? This post will explore the differences between the two ad blocking extensions.

AdBlock was created by an independent developer for Chrome and Safari when Adblock Plus was still only available for Firefox. He claims to have been inspired by the Adblock Plus movement but is not related to it. Instead he is working on AdBlock for profits from donations as well as paid clones users can purchase voluntarily to support him. Both adblock extensions provide exactly the functionality you expect from them, all ads are reliably blocked on every website. The extensions themselves don’t block anything – the unwanted elements such as advertisements are defined by filter lists.
AdBlock from getadblock.com

AdBlock from getadblock.com – The most popular Chrome extension, with over 15 million users! Blocks ads all over the web.

Adblock Plus from adblockplus.org - The free adblock tool for Chrome: Blocks annoying video ads on YouTube, Facebook ads, banners and much more.

Adblock Plus from adblockplus.org

Adblock Plus for Google Chrome was created by the Adblock Plus community, an open-source movement that is supported by many voluntary contributors who aim to make the internet better for everyone by eliminating bad advertisements. It was originally created for Firefox and was only recently ported as a beta version to Google Chrome. With more than 125 million downloads it is themost popular browser addon in the world.

Both AdBlock and Adblock Plus use the same filter lists that were created for Firefox Adblock Plus.While this works fine on banners and layer-ads, blocking ads embedded in videos is not possible due to a limitation in the blocking capability of the Chrome browser. Adblock Plus has implemented a workaround to that limitation which, unfortunately, only works on Youtube.com and not on other video sites or embedded videos.

While both extensions work almost on a same level, a more detailed analysis is needed in order to find out which one of them is the better adblocker:


Adblock

Adblock Plus
Installation process 8 10 Small deduction of points for AdBlock due to the fact that an intrusive window is opened during the installation that asks for a donation to the developer
User interface 9 7 Adblock Plus is still in beta and so far only has a rather minimalistic interface
Speed 8 10 AdBlock slows down the browser when multiple tabs are opened
Blocking banner ads 10 10 Both are using the same filter lists and hardly miss any ad
Blocking video ads 4 7 Video ads often cannot be blocked due to a limitation in the WebKit engine Chrome is based on. Adblock Plus performs significantly better on youtube.com
Creating own filters 9 7 Both provide the functionality to easily create own blocking rules;AdBlock makes it slightly more convenient to select unwanted elements on a website
Total 48 51

Conclusion: In conclusion, both extensions are efficient adblockers, although not as good as the Firefox one. Adblock Plus is based on the same code as the Firefox version and therefore is little bit more sophisticated as it doesn’t negatively impact the performance of the browser and works more reliably on youtube.com. You can install the Adblock Plus extension here.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. Adblock Plus is based on the same code as the Firefox version = this wasn’t, isn’t and won’t be even true. API is totally different in Chrome and Firefox.

    ABP was just renamed extension from AdThwart, so it wasn’t built from scratch.

    By the way, this review is old cca. two years, you can see it on other websites too.

    Like

  2. Adblock Plus is based on the same code as the Firefox version = this wasn’t, isn’t and won’t be even true. API is totally different in Chrome and Firefox.

    ABP was just renamed extension from AdThwart, so it wasn’t built from scratch.

    By the way, this review is old cca. two years, you can see it on other websites too.

    Like


Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s